<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on ReiserFS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/03/20/thoughts-on-reiserfs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/03/20/thoughts-on-reiserfs/</link>
	<description>Stay curious!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xaprb</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/03/20/thoughts-on-reiserfs/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Xaprb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=111#comment-146</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I spoke too boldly, Rob!  I wasn't saying that on my own authority; Hans Reiser said it in the video, if I recall correctly.  If I'm misquoting him, I apologize for that too.  (I don't have time to view the movie again and see).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I should have said "According to the video..."&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoke too boldly, Rob!  I wasn&#8217;t saying that on my own authority; Hans Reiser said it in the video, if I recall correctly.  If I&#8217;m misquoting him, I apologize for that too.  (I don&#8217;t have time to view the movie again and see).</p>
<p>I should have said &#8220;According to the video&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Terrell</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/03/20/thoughts-on-reiserfs/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Terrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=111#comment-145</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You said: &lt;i&gt;Consider this: for the first time in history, a compressed filesystem is faster than an uncompressed one.&lt;/i&gt; Not entirely true. Way back in time, when using the Mac OS (System 6) with a SCSI disk drive, you could improve read and write times with DiskDoubler turned on. As drive buffers grew, this advantage disappeared. Still, you've piqued my interest, I'll give 4 a try.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said: <i>Consider this: for the first time in history, a compressed filesystem is faster than an uncompressed one.</i> Not entirely true. Way back in time, when using the Mac OS (System 6) with a SCSI disk drive, you could improve read and write times with DiskDoubler turned on. As drive buffers grew, this advantage disappeared. Still, you&#8217;ve piqued my interest, I&#8217;ll give 4 a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim McCormack</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/03/20/thoughts-on-reiserfs/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim McCormack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=111#comment-110</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a little worried about compressed file systems.  I just had to grep my hard drive for a file I had deleted minutes after creating it, and that would not have been possible on a compressed file system.  On the other hand, it does lend itself to data protection -- when you delete your data, it really is pretty much gone.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little worried about compressed file systems.  I just had to grep my hard drive for a file I had deleted minutes after creating it, and that would not have been possible on a compressed file system.  On the other hand, it does lend itself to data protection &#8212; when you delete your data, it really is pretty much gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
