<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to use ORDER BY and LIMIT on multi-table updates in MySQL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/10/how-to-use-order-by-and-limit-on-multi-table-updates-in-mysql/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/10/how-to-use-order-by-and-limit-on-multi-table-updates-in-mysql/</link>
	<description>Stay curious!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:41:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harish Balakrishnan</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/10/how-to-use-order-by-and-limit-on-multi-table-updates-in-mysql/#comment-15226</link>
		<dc:creator>Harish Balakrishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=211#comment-15226</guid>
		<description>Hi,

      Is it possible to have update in a iterative loop with start index and range wtih the query? I wouuld like to have the update happen in steps with loop to avoid getting the entire table locked. 

      Also, I do fine the query takes around 10.88 secs to update to complete. this is one reason i prefer to have update happen in steps so that entire table locking do not happen.

      its innodb table.  

Regards

Harish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>      Is it possible to have update in a iterative loop with start index and range wtih the query? I wouuld like to have the update happen in steps with loop to avoid getting the entire table locked. </p>
<p>      Also, I do fine the query takes around 10.88 secs to update to complete. this is one reason i prefer to have update happen in steps so that entire table locking do not happen.</p>
<p>      its innodb table.  </p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Harish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

