<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Role-based access control in SQL, part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/18/role-based-access-control-in-sql-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/18/role-based-access-control-in-sql-part-2/</link>
	<description>Stay curious!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:56:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Gearon</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/18/role-based-access-control-in-sql-part-2/#comment-19508</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Gearon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=215#comment-19508</guid>
		<description>Mesa,
     Just reread article, both pages. Xarpb talks about maybe putting the unix perms in with the other perms. If you do so, let us know.

Danny,
     I like the idea of stored procedures as well. It would REALLY interfere with an ORM/Framework like Symfony, CakePHP, Spring-Roo-Hibernate, which expect to run just standard queries against the database. Actually, I&#039;m not sure how to combine them. I&#039;ll probably have to implement it as a separate authorization &#039;service&#039; that gets consulted prior to any action on objects/tables. This doesn&#039;t prevent coders from making mistakes, wich is a key design point in any good system.

I THINK there is a way to partition between the ORM and the dbase layer that may allow a &#039;separation of concerns&#039; in Java. I&#039;ll see eventually. And I&#039;ll post it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mesa,<br />
     Just reread article, both pages. Xarpb talks about maybe putting the unix perms in with the other perms. If you do so, let us know.</p>
<p>Danny,<br />
     I like the idea of stored procedures as well. It would REALLY interfere with an ORM/Framework like Symfony, CakePHP, Spring-Roo-Hibernate, which expect to run just standard queries against the database. Actually, I&#8217;m not sure how to combine them. I&#8217;ll probably have to implement it as a separate authorization &#8216;service&#8217; that gets consulted prior to any action on objects/tables. This doesn&#8217;t prevent coders from making mistakes, wich is a key design point in any good system.</p>
<p>I THINK there is a way to partition between the ORM and the dbase layer that may allow a &#8216;separation of concerns&#8217; in Java. I&#8217;ll see eventually. And I&#8217;ll post it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mesa</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/18/role-based-access-control-in-sql-part-2/#comment-19504</link>
		<dc:creator>Mesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=215#comment-19504</guid>
		<description>Dennis I like the unixperms very much as I think they would probably handle most cases, but I also kinda like the way the extra permissions are handled, and thought I would like to make everything consistent.  That is handle all the permissions the way they are done in part 2. 

I am determined to implement this, and am fiddling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis I like the unixperms very much as I think they would probably handle most cases, but I also kinda like the way the extra permissions are handled, and thought I would like to make everything consistent.  That is handle all the permissions the way they are done in part 2. </p>
<p>I am determined to implement this, and am fiddling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Gearon</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/18/role-based-access-control-in-sql-part-2/#comment-19501</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Gearon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 03:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=215#comment-19501</guid>
		<description>When I&#039;ve done more with it, I will add to this blog to help everyone. Give me till the end of the year, though ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I&#8217;ve done more with it, I will add to this blog to help everyone. Give me till the end of the year, though ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xaprb</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/18/role-based-access-control-in-sql-part-2/#comment-19500</link>
		<dc:creator>Xaprb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=215#comment-19500</guid>
		<description>I have grown accustomed to reading responses to this post, but the system is complex enough that I don&#039;t truly remember it anymore, and would need to study again to provide meaningful answers.  So I apologize for my lack of replies.  But I&#039;m likely not to find time to dig into this again, and hope that what I&#039;ve posted is a helpful starting point to people searching for a solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have grown accustomed to reading responses to this post, but the system is complex enough that I don&#8217;t truly remember it anymore, and would need to study again to provide meaningful answers.  So I apologize for my lack of replies.  But I&#8217;m likely not to find time to dig into this again, and hope that what I&#8217;ve posted is a helpful starting point to people searching for a solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Gearon</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/18/role-based-access-control-in-sql-part-2/#comment-19499</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Gearon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=215#comment-19499</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve seen, this page is no longer paid attention to by the owner.

I haven&#039;t implemented it yet. I will be doing it with a JAVA front end. 

About the unix perms. I don&#039;t know specifically, but I think having the hybrid nature of this, unix_perms + ACL(?) is what makes it so fast and versatile. You get off the ground with the unix perms, run most queries with that, and then get your corner/edge permission-object-user conditions as needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve seen, this page is no longer paid attention to by the owner.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t implemented it yet. I will be doing it with a JAVA front end. </p>
<p>About the unix perms. I don&#8217;t know specifically, but I think having the hybrid nature of this, unix_perms + ACL(?) is what makes it so fast and versatile. You get off the ground with the unix perms, run most queries with that, and then get your corner/edge permission-object-user conditions as needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

