Comments on: If you only learn one thing about database transactions, it should be this http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/27/if-you-only-learn-one-thing-about-database-transactions-it-should-be-this/ Stay curious! Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:41:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Rue Plumet » Interesting Sites For This Week http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/27/if-you-only-learn-one-thing-about-database-transactions-it-should-be-this/#comment-1698 Rue Plumet » Interesting Sites For This Week Mon, 04 Sep 2006 02:37:52 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=212#comment-1698 <p>[...] If you only learn one thing about database transactions, it should be this Tagged as: database design [...]</p> [...] If you only learn one thing about database transactions, it should be this Tagged as: database design [...]

]]> By: Nate K http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/27/if-you-only-learn-one-thing-about-database-transactions-it-should-be-this/#comment-1652 Nate K Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:38:56 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=212#comment-1652 <p>This is a great list. I think its overlooked by many that work with databases. Your comparison of 'running out into the rain' hit the nail on the head for me. Get in, get your work done, and get out. It shouldn't be a trivial process.</p> This is a great list. I think its overlooked by many that work with databases. Your comparison of ‘running out into the rain’ hit the nail on the head for me. Get in, get your work done, and get out. It shouldn’t be a trivial process.

]]> By: Xaprb http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/27/if-you-only-learn-one-thing-about-database-transactions-it-should-be-this/#comment-1651 Xaprb Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:44:48 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=212#comment-1651 <p>James, that's a great addition. Peter, I agree. I actually advised a client to go this way recently -- store incremental updates into a staging table, then apply updates from the staging table every ten minutes. It helps him get some more benefit from the query cache, too. We actually experimented with a good batch size at my employer when I was writing our archiving and purging jobs (see past articles), and found 1,000 rows worked very well -- it is small enough that it doesn't block much, but it isn't constantly trying to flush things to the disk either. It was many hundreds of times faster than a row at a time. So -- when I say "as small as possible" I don't mean a row at a time, I mean don't do unnecessary work.</p> James, that’s a great addition. Peter, I agree. I actually advised a client to go this way recently — store incremental updates into a staging table, then apply updates from the staging table every ten minutes. It helps him get some more benefit from the query cache, too. We actually experimented with a good batch size at my employer when I was writing our archiving and purging jobs (see past articles), and found 1,000 rows worked very well — it is small enough that it doesn’t block much, but it isn’t constantly trying to flush things to the disk either. It was many hundreds of times faster than a row at a time. So — when I say “as small as possible” I don’t mean a row at a time, I mean don’t do unnecessary work.

]]> By: Peter Zaitsev http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/27/if-you-only-learn-one-thing-about-database-transactions-it-should-be-this/#comment-1650 Peter Zaitsev Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:01:46 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=212#comment-1650 <p>Keep you transactions as small as possible is something I would be careful with. I've seen people doing 1.000.000 transactions to insert 1.000.000 rows. It is not smart ether as commit overhead is going to be significant. </p> <p>If you have batch operations medium size transactions are best, so commit overhead is not going to hurt you while you're not possibly blocking things for a lot of times due to locks :)</p> Keep you transactions as small as possible is something I would be careful with. I’ve seen people doing 1.000.000 transactions to insert 1.000.000 rows. It is not smart ether as commit overhead is going to be significant.

If you have batch operations medium size transactions are best, so commit overhead is not going to hurt you while you’re not possibly blocking things for a lot of times due to locks :)

]]> By: James Day http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/27/if-you-only-learn-one-thing-about-database-transactions-it-should-be-this/#comment-1649 James Day Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:36:26 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=212#comment-1649 <p>One other thing you can try is ensuring that the data is in the database server cache with a select outside the transaction. Adds to the general server load so it's mostly of interest in areas where contention is greatest, not as a general design rule.</p> One other thing you can try is ensuring that the data is in the database server cache with a select outside the transaction. Adds to the general server load so it’s mostly of interest in areas where contention is greatest, not as a general design rule.

]]>