<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing MySQL Table Maintainer</title>
	<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/</link>
	<description>Stay curious!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Xaprb</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-5420</link>
		<author>Xaprb</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-5420</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No extra locks like LOCK TABLES.  But I'm seriously considering deleting this tool, since as Peter pointed out it (mostly) duplicates the functionality of mysqlcheck :(&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No extra locks like LOCK TABLES.  But I&#8217;m seriously considering deleting this tool, since as Peter pointed out it (mostly) duplicates the functionality of mysqlcheck :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheeri</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-5412</link>
		<author>Sheeri</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-5412</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Do you mean it doesn't lock at all?  Or just doesn't lock on top of the commands like REPAIR?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean it doesn&#8217;t lock at all?  Or just doesn&#8217;t lock on top of the commands like REPAIR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xaprb</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-5304</link>
		<author>Xaprb</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-5304</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wait, how did I miss mysqlcheck?  I spent several evenings duplicating a tool that's already provided :-(&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will have to research more carefully next time!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, how did I miss mysqlcheck?  I spent several evenings duplicating a tool that&#8217;s already provided :-(</p>
<p>I will have to research more carefully next time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Zaitsev</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-5303</link>
		<author>Peter Zaitsev</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-5303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hm,

Why are you looking at myisamchk at all ?  Especially if you're working with multiple storage engines you're much better of using mysqlcheck instead. 

myisamchk has some features which are myisam specific and not available via mysqlcheck.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm,</p>
<p>Why are you looking at myisamchk at all ?  Especially if you&#8217;re working with multiple storage engines you&#8217;re much better of using mysqlcheck instead. </p>
<p>myisamchk has some features which are myisam specific and not available via mysqlcheck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
