<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing MySQL Table Maintainer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/</link>
	<description>Stay curious!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:56:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthik</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-15715</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=327#comment-15715</guid>
		<description>Well, it gives a more detailed report for starters.
Also, it would be great if it gave a summary at the end of the run as to how many tables were checked/which had issues so that further investigation is possible. This helps for people like me who have 40k + tables. mysqlchk scrolls too fast and its a pain to keep looking at the OKs to see if anything is not OK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it gives a more detailed report for starters.<br />
Also, it would be great if it gave a summary at the end of the run as to how many tables were checked/which had issues so that further investigation is possible. This helps for people like me who have 40k + tables. mysqlchk scrolls too fast and its a pain to keep looking at the OKs to see if anything is not OK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xaprb</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-5420</link>
		<dc:creator>Xaprb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=327#comment-5420</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No extra locks like LOCK TABLES.  But I&#039;m seriously considering deleting this tool, since as Peter pointed out it (mostly) duplicates the functionality of mysqlcheck :(&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No extra locks like LOCK TABLES.  But I&#8217;m seriously considering deleting this tool, since as Peter pointed out it (mostly) duplicates the functionality of mysqlcheck :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheeri</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-5412</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=327#comment-5412</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Do you mean it doesn&#039;t lock at all?  Or just doesn&#039;t lock on top of the commands like REPAIR?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean it doesn&#8217;t lock at all?  Or just doesn&#8217;t lock on top of the commands like REPAIR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xaprb</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-5304</link>
		<dc:creator>Xaprb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=327#comment-5304</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wait, how did I miss mysqlcheck?  I spent several evenings duplicating a tool that&#039;s already provided :-(&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will have to research more carefully next time!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, how did I miss mysqlcheck?  I spent several evenings duplicating a tool that&#8217;s already provided :-(</p>
<p>I will have to research more carefully next time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Zaitsev</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/25/introducing-mysql-table-maintainer/#comment-5303</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Zaitsev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=327#comment-5303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hm,

Why are you looking at myisamchk at all ?  Especially if you&#039;re working with multiple storage engines you&#039;re much better of using mysqlcheck instead. 

myisamchk has some features which are myisam specific and not available via mysqlcheck.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm,</p>
<p>Why are you looking at myisamchk at all ?  Especially if you&#8217;re working with multiple storage engines you&#8217;re much better of using mysqlcheck instead. </p>
<p>myisamchk has some features which are myisam specific and not available via mysqlcheck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

