Comments on: MySQL Table Checksum 1.1.0 released http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/05/05/mysql-table-checksum-110-released/ Stay curious! Mon, 13 May 2013 05:55:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Xaprb http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/05/05/mysql-table-checksum-110-released/#comment-15132 Xaprb Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:26:55 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=187#comment-15132 All of the information on this page now pertains to Maatkit, which has replaced mysqltoolkit due to copyright reasons. You can get more information at http://www.maatkit.org/

]]> By: Xaprb http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/05/05/mysql-table-checksum-110-released/#comment-14721 Xaprb Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:29:57 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=187#comment-14721 No, you can’t. You’re right, it’s not really that useful. It’s only CRC32 anyway — not a very good way to checksum a lot of data.

]]> By: fleegan http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/05/05/mysql-table-checksum-110-released/#comment-14718 fleegan Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:26:13 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=187#comment-14718 Forgive me if this is the wrong place to ask…but, for myISAMS’s using CHECKSUM TABLE, are there any way to pull the checksums into variables within Stored Procedures to test against?

So far, I haven’t been able to & have therefore found little use for the CHECKSUM TABLE feature. Any clues or directions would be greatly appreciated.

-fleegan

]]> By: Xaprb http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/05/05/mysql-table-checksum-110-released/#comment-12225 Xaprb Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:02:55 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=187#comment-12225 No, it’ll work fine with replication running.

]]> By: Luis Torres http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/05/05/mysql-table-checksum-110-released/#comment-12223 Luis Torres Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:25:50 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=187#comment-12223 Question here:

If tables in the master get modified while mysql-table-checksum is running then this won’t work, or will it?

In other words, do my master and slave have to be just sitting there accepting no connections for this to work? Or just one part has to be stopped (replication itself maybe).

]]>