Comments on: Progress on Maatkit bounty, part 2 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/12/03/progress-on-maatkit-bounty-part-2/ Stay curious! Fri, 10 May 2013 13:48:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Bruce Bristol http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/12/03/progress-on-maatkit-bounty-part-2/#comment-14105 Bruce Bristol Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:40:18 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/12/03/progress-on-maatkit-bounty-part-2/#comment-14105 Hi Baron,

Just to follow-up, MySQL said my bug report was a duplicate of bug #30041.

Seems tables -can- be different if they contain doubles or floats.

Anyway, looks like it’s patched for MySQL 5.2 and 6.0, but not 5.0 or 5.1.

-Bruce

]]> By: Bruce Bristol http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/12/03/progress-on-maatkit-bounty-part-2/#comment-13757 Bruce Bristol Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:51:40 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/12/03/progress-on-maatkit-bounty-part-2/#comment-13757 Done!

http://bugs.mysql.com/33015

]]> By: Xaprb http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/12/03/progress-on-maatkit-bounty-part-2/#comment-13756 Xaprb Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:21:20 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/12/03/progress-on-maatkit-bounty-part-2/#comment-13756 You should report it :) http://bugs.mysql.com/

]]> By: Bruce Bristol http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/12/03/progress-on-maatkit-bounty-part-2/#comment-13755 Bruce Bristol Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:09:35 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/12/03/progress-on-maatkit-bounty-part-2/#comment-13755 Hi Baron,

I just did another full test using ACCUM and it all came back fine. So it certainly does seem there’s some sort of bug with MySQL’s CHECKSUM routine.

I’m curious as to what it is…

]]> By: Bruce Bristol http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/12/03/progress-on-maatkit-bounty-part-2/#comment-13754 Bruce Bristol Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:27:42 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/12/03/progress-on-maatkit-bounty-part-2/#comment-13754 Yes, table formats are both ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8.

]]>