Comments on: Maatkit version 1674 released http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/01/05/maatkit-version-1674-released/ Stay curious! Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:56:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Bruce Bristol http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/01/05/maatkit-version-1674-released/#comment-14180 Bruce Bristol Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:27:28 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/01/05/maatkit-version-1674-released/#comment-14180 Hi Baron, Just wanted to let you know I found the cause. They're using the UUID() function which doesn't yet work in replication. Have a good weekend! -Bruce Hi Baron,

Just wanted to let you know I found the cause. They’re using the UUID() function which doesn’t yet work in replication.

Have a good weekend!

-Bruce

]]> By: Bruce Bristol http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/01/05/maatkit-version-1674-released/#comment-14179 Bruce Bristol Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:23:03 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/01/05/maatkit-version-1674-released/#comment-14179 I decided to do another sql compare using left join, as I should've in the first place and found 300 rows that have different primary keys, so there indeed are differences. Thanks for your time, Baron! -Bruce I decided to do another sql compare using left join, as I should’ve in the first place and found 300 rows that have different primary keys, so there indeed are differences.

Thanks for your time, Baron!

-Bruce

]]> By: Xaprb http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/01/05/maatkit-version-1674-released/#comment-14178 Xaprb Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:54:18 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/01/05/maatkit-version-1674-released/#comment-14178 Try running mk-table-sync and see if it finds any rows different, then inspect those rows. I'm curious if that'll shed any light. Try running mk-table-sync and see if it finds any rows different, then inspect those rows. I’m curious if that’ll shed any light.

]]> By: Bruce Bristol http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/01/05/maatkit-version-1674-released/#comment-14177 Bruce Bristol Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:51:33 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/01/05/maatkit-version-1674-released/#comment-14177 Nope. Here are the original table names which I copied to another db to do the SQL comparison: DATABASE TABLE CHUNK HOST ENGINE COUNT CHECKSUM TIME WAIT STAT LAG sugarcrm acl_users_actions 0 grm-db-slave0 InnoDB 440342 6593e420b3992899b5a6c57493cd99f0 4 0 NULL NULL sugarcrm acl_users_actions 0 grm-db InnoDB 440342 146557c1fffdb11126c5184a5734b399 4 0 NULL NULL Nope. Here are the original table names which I copied to another db to do the SQL comparison:

DATABASE TABLE CHUNK HOST ENGINE COUNT CHECKSUM TIME WAIT STAT LAG
sugarcrm acl_users_actions 0 grm-db-slave0 InnoDB 440342 6593e420b3992899b5a6c57493cd99f0 4 0 NULL NULL
sugarcrm acl_users_actions 0 grm-db InnoDB 440342 146557c1fffdb11126c5184a5734b399 4 0 NULL NULL

]]> By: Xaprb http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/01/05/maatkit-version-1674-released/#comment-14176 Xaprb Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:47:16 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/01/05/maatkit-version-1674-released/#comment-14176 Then there are probably rows missing from one of the tables. Check the row count. If you use mk-table-sync with --print, you can see what it thinks is different. Then there are probably rows missing from one of the tables. Check the row count. If you use mk-table-sync with –print, you can see what it thinks is different.

]]>