<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would Tufte approve of mixing units on a graph?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/10/09/would-tufte-approve-of-mixing-units-on-a-graph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/10/09/would-tufte-approve-of-mixing-units-on-a-graph/</link>
	<description>Stay curious!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Rimm-Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/10/09/would-tufte-approve-of-mixing-units-on-a-graph/#comment-15262</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rimm-Kaufman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=603#comment-15262</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You can graph the temperature on your server’s hard drives, or the Dow Jones Industrial Average, or whatever.&lt;i&gt;
Don't graph the Dow -- too depressing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You can graph the temperature on your server’s hard drives, or the Dow Jones Industrial Average, or whatever.</i><i><br />
Don&#8217;t graph the Dow &#8212; too depressing.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xaprb</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/10/09/would-tufte-approve-of-mixing-units-on-a-graph/#comment-15222</link>
		<dc:creator>Xaprb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=603#comment-15222</guid>
		<description>Found my answer -- RRDTool doesn't do a second y-axis, although it has been tossed around for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found my answer &#8212; RRDTool doesn&#8217;t do a second y-axis, although it has been tossed around for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xaprb</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/10/09/would-tufte-approve-of-mixing-units-on-a-graph/#comment-15219</link>
		<dc:creator>Xaprb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=603#comment-15219</guid>
		<description>Good point.  I don't know if/how-easy RRDTool makes it to do that, but as far as I know Cacti doesn't let you do it.

I think another acceptable fix is to simply have them in different graphs.  By default Cacti shows all of a machine's graphs on a single page, so it is in fact easy to see the relationships between the events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  I don&#8217;t know if/how-easy RRDTool makes it to do that, but as far as I know Cacti doesn&#8217;t let you do it.</p>
<p>I think another acceptable fix is to simply have them in different graphs.  By default Cacti shows all of a machine&#8217;s graphs on a single page, so it is in fact easy to see the relationships between the events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter s. paz</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/10/09/would-tufte-approve-of-mixing-units-on-a-graph/#comment-15217</link>
		<dc:creator>peter s. paz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=603#comment-15217</guid>
		<description>You problem is not the mixing of units on the graph. In fact, that's what you want to do, show relationships between events. The problem is not that you are mixing unit in the same graph, but in the same axis. This messes up the scaling, especially for items that have extreme values on the axis.

A simple fix for the graph is to use the secondary axis (right hand) for the second set of units, and the scaling for the MB should pop back into the range to where you can really see what is going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You problem is not the mixing of units on the graph. In fact, that&#8217;s what you want to do, show relationships between events. The problem is not that you are mixing unit in the same graph, but in the same axis. This messes up the scaling, especially for items that have extreme values on the axis.</p>
<p>A simple fix for the graph is to use the secondary axis (right hand) for the second set of units, and the scaling for the MB should pop back into the range to where you can really see what is going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernesto Vargas</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/10/09/would-tufte-approve-of-mixing-units-on-a-graph/#comment-15192</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernesto Vargas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=603#comment-15192</guid>
		<description>Baron is it cacti 0.8.7 compatible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baron is it cacti 0.8.7 compatible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
