Comments on: MySQL 5.1.33, now with 4 secret bugs http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/04/09/mysql-5133-now-with-4-secret-bugs/ Stay curious! Thu, 02 May 2013 12:36:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: MySQL replication breaks single-threaded limitation? at Xaprb http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/04/09/mysql-5133-now-with-4-secret-bugs/#comment-16271 MySQL replication breaks single-threaded limitation? at Xaprb Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:00:04 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=971#comment-16271 [...] the feature preview is based on MySQL 5.1, which has recently seemed to be getting some significant changes even though it’s a GA release. Does this signal a change to MySQL’s release [...]

]]> By: Xaprb http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/04/09/mysql-5133-now-with-4-secret-bugs/#comment-16249 Xaprb Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:48:58 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=971#comment-16249 I filed a documentation bug as suggested.

http://bugs.mysql.com/44217

]]> By: Log Buffer #142: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs | Pythian Group Blog http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/04/09/mysql-5133-now-with-4-secret-bugs/#comment-16246 Log Buffer #142: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs | Pythian Group Blog Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:43:13 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=971#comment-16246 [...] bugs (or while they’re on us), let’s look at some MySQL ones. Baron Schwartz found, in MySQL 5.1.33, 4 secret bugs. This follows an item on MySQL and IBM by Baron’s colleague Vadim, in which the latter [...]

]]> By: VadimTk http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/04/09/mysql-5133-now-with-4-secret-bugs/#comment-16245 VadimTk Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:23:46 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=971#comment-16245 Giuseppe,

Nope we can’t, it’s fun :)

]]> By: Todd http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/04/09/mysql-5133-now-with-4-secret-bugs/#comment-16243 Todd Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:48:37 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=971#comment-16243 Not only have there been MySQL pages and information available for some time, but this has been publicized heavily by IBM in the iSeries user space. This information isn’t of interest to most casual MySQL users – or perhaps even most existing MySQL users, period – but it’s of great interest to iSeries users.

I don’t think there is an expectation that suddenly a bunch of MySQL users will go out and purchase iSeries machines (although I’m sure IBM wouldn’t mind that), but rather that existing iSeries users see a compelling new value proposition in leveraging MySQL on their platform of choice. It just makes sense to me that the bulk of communication be focused on iSeries users (which I presume you are not), rather than blasting the general MySQL user base.

]]>