Comments on: Observations on key-value databases http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/09/20/observations-on-key-value-databases/ Stay curious! Thu, 02 May 2013 12:36:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Xaprb http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/09/20/observations-on-key-value-databases/#comment-16997 Xaprb Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:42:20 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1292#comment-16997 It does.

]]>
By: Jo http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/09/20/observations-on-key-value-databases/#comment-16996 Jo Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:57:41 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1292#comment-16996 afaik CouchDB has mvcc

]]>
By: Ryan http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/09/20/observations-on-key-value-databases/#comment-16994 Ryan Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:39:51 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1292#comment-16994 Mongo is a great product but it’s a tad different in the DB graph (i.e., feature versus raw throughput). Mongo would probably perform really well in a simple key/value (versus the more sophisticated Mongo document design) scenario but I haven’t seen any numbers published.

]]>
By: Xaprb http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/09/20/observations-on-key-value-databases/#comment-16993 Xaprb Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:37:29 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1292#comment-16993 I wasn’t trying to give a complete list, just drop some names to hand-wave so people would know what category I’m talking about.

]]>
By: Morgan Tocker http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/09/20/observations-on-key-value-databases/#comment-16992 Morgan Tocker Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:18:50 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1292#comment-16992 I’m kind of surprised you didn’t mention MongoDB – it’s probably the NoSQL database I’m most interested in. It answers your ‘is it going to be supported?’ question quite well – there’s a company (10gen) behind it.

]]>