<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why high-availability is hard with databases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/04/26/why-high-availability-is-hard-with-databases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/04/26/why-high-availability-is-hard-with-databases/</link>
	<description>Stay curious!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:56:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xaprb</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/04/26/why-high-availability-is-hard-with-databases/#comment-18225</link>
		<dc:creator>Xaprb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1778#comment-18225</guid>
		<description>As one example, a lot of people are hosted in various clouds or high-volume resellers where there simply aren&#039;t any guarantees.

Cost... it all depends on your point of view.  I have a blog post drafted on the illusion that &quot;the cloud is low cost.&quot;  Many businesses subsist on illusions.  It is sometimes easier to create a convincing illusion, than a convincing real thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one example, a lot of people are hosted in various clouds or high-volume resellers where there simply aren&#8217;t any guarantees.</p>
<p>Cost&#8230; it all depends on your point of view.  I have a blog post drafted on the illusion that &#8220;the cloud is low cost.&#8221;  Many businesses subsist on illusions.  It is sometimes easier to create a convincing illusion, than a convincing real thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GCM</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/04/26/why-high-availability-is-hard-with-databases/#comment-18223</link>
		<dc:creator>GCM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1778#comment-18223</guid>
		<description>&gt; A lot of Percona&#039;s customers are also hosted on hardware that simply can&#039;t be made reliable.

Well..the servers we sell are Intel based running Windows, Linux or VmWare.  What sort of HW are you using?  As for the cost...compared to what?  Downtime costs a bunch.  For that matter replicated servers and the related infrastructure isn&#039;t exactly cheap either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; A lot of Percona&#8217;s customers are also hosted on hardware that simply can&#8217;t be made reliable.</p>
<p>Well..the servers we sell are Intel based running Windows, Linux or VmWare.  What sort of HW are you using?  As for the cost&#8230;compared to what?  Downtime costs a bunch.  For that matter replicated servers and the related infrastructure isn&#8217;t exactly cheap either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xaprb</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/04/26/why-high-availability-is-hard-with-databases/#comment-18221</link>
		<dc:creator>Xaprb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1778#comment-18221</guid>
		<description>That doesn&#039;t scale very far and gets extremely expensive (in the general case; in your specific case it sounds like you have crafted a great solution).  A lot of Percona&#039;s customers are also hosted on hardware that simply can&#039;t be made reliable.

Related link I just saw, which has premises I basically agree with: http://highscalability.com/blog/2010/4/28/elasticity-for-the-enterprise-ensuring-continuous-high-avail.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That doesn&#8217;t scale very far and gets extremely expensive (in the general case; in your specific case it sounds like you have crafted a great solution).  A lot of Percona&#8217;s customers are also hosted on hardware that simply can&#8217;t be made reliable.</p>
<p>Related link I just saw, which has premises I basically agree with: <a href="http://highscalability.com/blog/2010/4/28/elasticity-for-the-enterprise-ensuring-continuous-high-avail.html" rel="nofollow">http://highscalability.com/blog/2010/4/28/elasticity-for-the-enterprise-ensuring-continuous-high-avail.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GCM</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/04/26/why-high-availability-is-hard-with-databases/#comment-18220</link>
		<dc:creator>GCM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1778#comment-18220</guid>
		<description>In your web server example, you are create a HA solution out of essentially non-HA hardware through the application.  If one of your servers goes toes up, the application works around it.  In the database example, that&#039;s really not an option.  As you&#039;ve described, if a server fails, you&#039;ve got problems.  The obvious solution is to use highly reliable, fault tolerant hardware to ensure that the server DOESN&#039;T fail.  That&#039;s the approach that we take at Stratus Technologies.  Instead of worrying about recovering from a failure we put our effort into avoiding the failure in the first place (our servers have 99.999% uptime)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your web server example, you are create a HA solution out of essentially non-HA hardware through the application.  If one of your servers goes toes up, the application works around it.  In the database example, that&#8217;s really not an option.  As you&#8217;ve described, if a server fails, you&#8217;ve got problems.  The obvious solution is to use highly reliable, fault tolerant hardware to ensure that the server DOESN&#8217;T fail.  That&#8217;s the approach that we take at Stratus Technologies.  Instead of worrying about recovering from a failure we put our effort into avoiding the failure in the first place (our servers have 99.999% uptime)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah novotny</title>
		<link>http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/04/26/why-high-availability-is-hard-with-databases/#comment-18214</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah novotny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1778#comment-18214</guid>
		<description>amen.  i&#039;m fresh out of HA pixie dust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amen.  i&#8217;m fresh out of HA pixie dust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

