Comments on: Is Maatkit notable enough for Wikipedia now? http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/07/02/is-maatkit-notable-enough-for-wikipedia-now/ Stay curious! Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:56:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Henrik Ingo http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/07/02/is-maatkit-notable-enough-for-wikipedia-now/#comment-18470 Henrik Ingo Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:43:27 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1910#comment-18470 And let's not forget Daniel Nichter got the MySQL Community Member of the Year 2010 award for Maatkit. And let’s not forget Daniel Nichter got the MySQL Community Member of the Year 2010 award for Maatkit.

]]> By: Greenlion http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/07/02/is-maatkit-notable-enough-for-wikipedia-now/#comment-18468 Greenlion Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:52:12 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1910#comment-18468 If a product is notable enough to have a booth at the MySQL conference, I think it is notable enough to be on Wikipedia. If it notable enough to be mentioned in even a single book, let alone multiple books, then it should be in Wikipedia. If a product is notable enough to have a booth at the MySQL conference, I think it is notable enough to be on Wikipedia.

If it notable enough to be mentioned in even a single book, let alone multiple books, then it should be in Wikipedia.

]]> By: William http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/07/02/is-maatkit-notable-enough-for-wikipedia-now/#comment-18467 William Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:54:45 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1910#comment-18467 I think maatkit is notable enough. XtraDB has its own wikipedia page. I'd argue that maatkit is more notable as its a more integral part of the mysql environment. I'll consider contributing to the article, in my mythical spare time ;) I think maatkit is notable enough. XtraDB has its own wikipedia page. I’d argue that maatkit is more notable as its a more integral part of the mysql environment. I’ll consider contributing to the article, in my mythical spare time ;)

]]>