Comments on: Is Maatkit notable enough for Wikipedia now? http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/07/02/is-maatkit-notable-enough-for-wikipedia-now/ Stay curious! Fri, 10 May 2013 18:25:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Henrik Ingo http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/07/02/is-maatkit-notable-enough-for-wikipedia-now/#comment-18470 Henrik Ingo Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:43:27 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1910#comment-18470 And let’s not forget Daniel Nichter got the MySQL Community Member of the Year 2010 award for Maatkit.

]]> By: Greenlion http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/07/02/is-maatkit-notable-enough-for-wikipedia-now/#comment-18468 Greenlion Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:52:12 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1910#comment-18468 If a product is notable enough to have a booth at the MySQL conference, I think it is notable enough to be on Wikipedia.

If it notable enough to be mentioned in even a single book, let alone multiple books, then it should be in Wikipedia.

]]> By: William http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2010/07/02/is-maatkit-notable-enough-for-wikipedia-now/#comment-18467 William Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:54:45 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=1910#comment-18467 I think maatkit is notable enough. XtraDB has its own wikipedia page. I’d argue that maatkit is more notable as its a more integral part of the mysql environment. I’ll consider contributing to the article, in my mythical spare time ;)

]]>