http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2011/10/19/blackhole-tables-and-auto-increment-keys/ Stay curious! Thu, 02 May 2013 12:36:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2011/10/19/blackhole-tables-and-auto-increment-keys/#comment-19717 Dathan Pattishall Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:31:39 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=2516#comment-19717 Could you elaborate on why you think Galera replication is the right way to replicate ( I am not too familiar with Galera)? Also why the storage engine implements replication over an abstracted layer is better? Wouldn’t you loose the ability to replicate innodb to PBXT for instance?

]]> http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2011/10/19/blackhole-tables-and-auto-increment-keys/#comment-19715 Aaron Brown Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:26:59 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=2516#comment-19715 I’m writing a SQL best practices document for our devs and your statement about edge cases is applicable to my category of “don’t be slick.” I know a little bit about this bug, and I agree…this was a case of being too slick and getting bit by it. :)

]]> http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2011/10/19/blackhole-tables-and-auto-increment-keys/#comment-19706 Xaprb Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:29:07 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=2516#comment-19706 Fixed, thanks. This is one thing I don’t like about the new Firefox awesome bar. When I search history for a URL and copy it without loading the page, it leaves off the http:// part.

]]> http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2011/10/19/blackhole-tables-and-auto-increment-keys/#comment-19705 Fenway Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:59:33 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=2516#comment-19705 Those links are relative, and should be absolute — FYI.

]]>