Comments on: More details about SchoonerSQL performance, please! http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2012/02/02/more-details-about-schoonersql-performance-please/ Stay curious! Thu, 02 May 2013 12:36:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Xaprb http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2012/02/02/more-details-about-schoonersql-performance-please/#comment-19935 Xaprb Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:21:41 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=2581#comment-19935 I’m glad that Schooner published full results that anyone can reproduce. Now the door is open for people to say the comparison was apples-to-oranges because Schooner’s system has no redundancy (single node) and Clustrix’s had 2x redundancy. But that is another topic, and at least that conversation can be legitimate now.

]]> By: Darpan Dinker http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2012/02/02/more-details-about-schoonersql-performance-please/#comment-19934 Darpan Dinker Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:58:34 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=2581#comment-19934 Baron,
Here is a report that you requested. Please let me know if you’d like to see other details.

http://www.schoonerinfotech.com/downloads/benchmarks/Schooner_Benchmark_SchoonerSQL-Percona-TPCC-MySQL_details.pdf

Best regards,
Darpan

PS You wrote “I have absolutely no doubts that a single node of Schooner’s product can run like a deer”.
I’d rather like my product be called a deer (as opposed to a pig).
Thanks ;-)

]]> By: Darpan Dinker http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2012/02/02/more-details-about-schoonersql-performance-please/#comment-19870 Darpan Dinker Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:07:18 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=2581#comment-19870 Working with Baron and Vadim (thanks), I was able to decipher the output of tpcc-mysql (it can be definitely improved :) ).

I have updated my blog with a throughput charts – for folks who want to look at the stability of the same SchoonerSQL run:

http://darpanetwork.blogspot.com/2012/01/schoonersql-throughput-with-perconas.html

Yes, I will add more details after understanding the output some more with Vadim’s help.

]]> By: Darpan Dinker http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2012/02/02/more-details-about-schoonersql-performance-please/#comment-19869 Darpan Dinker Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:29:57 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=2581#comment-19869 Peter,
Good point.

Let’s see if I can move you along this process:
Doubt -> Verify -> Trust.

Darpan

]]> By: Peter Laursen http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2012/02/02/more-details-about-schoonersql-performance-please/#comment-19868 Peter Laursen Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:49:43 +0000 http://www.xaprb.com/blog/?p=2581#comment-19868 I remember some years back that SolidDB (now discontinued) published a benchmark ‘proving’ that it handled many times more transactions per second than InnoDB. It could not be verified independently unless a specific testcase was used.

So I can only agree that all details (configurations, data, queries/scripts) should be available. As long as this is not the case any postulate is as good as another.

]]>